|
|
|
|
|
|
by i_am_proteus
2479 days ago
|
|
|
Yes, but this isn't the language they'd use if one of the test success criteria was "no door blows out" and then a door blows out. This is evidenced by their plan to "analyze the door and run the test again." If this were actually a test failure, they'd be "analyzing the door, redesigning a bunch of stuff, and running the test again." |
|
|