|
|
|
|
|
by gizmo686
2481 days ago
|
|
There is a difference between "truth does not exist" and "we cannot know the truth". In theory, we can take a now worthless stock and look back in time to determine the actual present value at a given point in the past. In theory, we can imagine an outside observer running an arbitrarily large copies of our universe from a given point in time to determine the probability curve at said point in time (under whatever model of randomness you want to use). More plausibly, we can take a set of predicted probability curves and look back to see how accurate they were (did events predicted with uncorralated 50% probability happen half the time?). Economics is hard, because it is very difficult to determine these facts, even in retrospect, but they still exist. |
|
If we can't know the truth, how do we know it exists (in this situation)? I'm not convinced there's an objective true value of a stock -- it seems like stock prices are the general consensus of a huge number of subjective inputs. And that will always be the case.
(Definitely appreciate the time and thought you've put into your responses, btw! Thank you.)