Honest question here: what are the advantages over fancy zones? I'm a linux i3 user and want to give a try on windows with fancy zones, I can give workspacer a try as well.
fancy zones is very different conceptually from i3/xmonad or workspacer.
fancy zones allows you to define a static layout, and then drag windows into the zones you create.
layouts in workspacer are defined in code, and are "always on", in that the window position/size is always handled by workspacer, instead of only when you ask for it.
fancy zones allows you to define a static layout, and then drag windows into the zones you create.
layouts in workspacer are defined in code, and are "always on", in that the window position/size is always handled by workspacer, instead of only when you ask for it.