|
|
|
|
|
|
by OskarS
2476 days ago
|
|
|
If that were the case, would the limits be so small? I mean, it's usually like "less than 16 characters" or something. The extra CPU time to raise that limit to, like, 128 or something would be totally insignificant (especially if they're using a key-derivation function after the hash, as they should be). |
|
|