|
|
|
|
|
|
by forgottenpass
2485 days ago
|
|
|
>If your photos live on the service's servers, they are no longer yours. They very easily could be, if the service wanted to write it's contract of adhesion to allow the user meaningful control over the scope of how the service can use the photos. But conventional wisdom believes there is less money in that route, and nobody in "tech" is willing to settle for less than maximum exploitation of assets. |
|
|
Practically, it's not. See my concern about security beaches.
Even if the service has a sane ownership policy right now, eventually someone will either change the service's policies or shut the service down.