|
|
|
|
|
by mehrdadn
2485 days ago
|
|
Understanding enough to exploit is not what I meant. I meant understanding enough to know how to secure it. Like how understanding how to design a secure RNG is a heck of a lot harder than knowing how to exploit an insecure one. > enough to set up a lattice basis and reduce it with LLL This gets across my point perfectly well. I rest my case. |
|
Sean Devlin has talked a bunch of people through actually writing these attacks in cryptopals set 8. We talked English professors through the "number-theoretic" attacks on RSA in cryptopals set 6. It's fine if you don't want to dip into this stuff, but I'm not OK with the pretense that this intuition is somehow unattainable.
We need more people playing with these attacks, and fewer people trying to assemble new cryptosystems out of libraries they understand only from the documentation on the web page.