[vinni2]

But a chicken or fish near you is far more environmentally friendly than vegetarian food from father places. So the title is a bit misleading.

[mlthoughts2018]

Your claim seems to be refuted by a lot of sources,

https://medium.com/@annieleymarie/tabitha-writes-that-the-ma...

The title is not misleading. Local meat, fish & dairy are worse all around than far-away vegetarian foods.

This is not an argument for or against being vegetarian, just a more or less indisputable measurement of food production.

[vinni2]

Technically diary products are still vegetarian so the title is still inaccurate. It should be vegan to be correct.

[mtalantikite]

Are they? The study left out fish, so I didn’t see that conclusion in there. Also, the title is pretty much the conclusion of the study: eating vegetarian has a greater environmental impact than eating local.

[vinni2]

So why are they generalizing their claims when they have left out whole category of foods? And they consider dairy as not vegetarian that’s not accurate either.