|
|
|
|
|
by wongarsu
2480 days ago
|
|
Sure, just build a video streaming website with good UI, a good recommendation/discovery algorithm, it's own avertising network (that is able to compete with YTs excellent personalized ads while having a more creator-friendly policy), spend more on human review of copyright claims than YT, establish a revenue share system for creators, as well as a system to pay monthly pledges similar to YT channel memberships or patreon (of course both need to comply with laws and regultions of all major countries), and have the budget to finance multiple months of video streaming and encoding servers. There's space in the market, but I don't think anyone is willing to pay for that after so many others failed. |
|
I'm sorry to pick on you because I also disagree with the post you replied to.
In that list, didn't you forget to mention something very important that's at the heart of this discussion?
A competitor or even google should have all those things _plus_ it should be legal.
Currently, it isn't. Either change the law or change the business model, but don't implement a business model that breaks the law and hope it will turn out fine in the end.
You can't have every business breaking laws it disagrees with, not even if some or most people disagree with that law.