|
|
|
|
|
by mlyle
2483 days ago
|
|
> Don't go building a automaton King Solomon who decides why this kid should be taken from these parents because speaking Spanish was worth -0.1 on some goddamn weight trained on data generated from a racist society. Totally what I advocated for and not a strawman attack /s. Indeed, the chance that such an algorithm could be racist or classist and there being needs to avoid bad correlations and have appropriate controls is important. I think there are opportunities here. Ideally ed-tech doesn't take humans out of the loop, but asks schoolteachers and administrators questions like, "Hey, are you sure students A, B, and C are being supported correctly for subject Z? Are you sure students D, E doesn't have some kind of abuse or other significant home problem? It sure looks like student F is in this subpopulation that research shows benefits from educational intervention Y. You might want to keep your eye out for that." And then the teacher goes "Oh, crap. Now that I think about D, there were always these little things 1, 2, and 3 that seemed off... maybe this is worth a referral to social services to check on what's up." Or "Oh, ... maybe F's struggles in reading really are a speech problem and we should handle that" |
|