>Following Brooks we distinguish accidental from essential diculty, but disagree with his premise that most complexity remaining in contemporary systems is essential
There's no silver bullet claim.
> Brooks asserts ... that the majority... of the complexity that we find in contemporary large systems is of the essential type. We disagree.
That means a silver bullet is possible (against Brooks's claim), and then they go on to describe what they think is a particular silver bullet.
> Brooks asserts ... that the majority... of the complexity that we find in contemporary large systems is of the essential type. We disagree.
That means a silver bullet is possible (against Brooks's claim), and then they go on to describe what they think is a particular silver bullet.