|
|
|
|
|
by sdegutis
2485 days ago
|
|
You can choose not to run the code by choosing not to buy that computer. Let the market come up with an alternative that guarantees that it doesn't do anything unethical and allows you to inspect it. Alternatively, and probably a better option, is that laws could be made to enforce companies requiring to pass some kind of test to ensure that it's not doing something in a list of banned things, such as espionage. This is how emissions tests work, and although people scammed those, they were penalized for it (and probably should have been far more). But it doesn't follow that companies should have to reveal all their secrets to prove to the general public that they pass these basic tests. |
|