[erikpukinskis]

It’s interesting, under your definition whether something is vegan depends on who is making it.

If your family just happens to make a 4-bean salad without meat, then for you that’s omnivorous.

If I make the exact same salad, but my family growing up typically would have put bacon in it, then that same salad becomes “vegan food” because for me it’s a contrivance.

It’s a relativistic definition of what’s vegan and what’s not.

[mytailorisrich]

"Vegan" refers to people, not food. Food is only "suitable for vegans".

There are many, many traditional dishes that do not contain meat or even any animal products. I see no reason to suddenly label them "vegetarian" or "vegan".

But when people work hard to make a burger without any animal products then it does make some sense to call the result "vegan food" in that it was made specifically to suit vegan people.

[okmokmz]

> "Vegan" refers to people, not food. Food is only "suitable for vegans".

Partially correct.

Vegan, the noun, refers to a person who does not eat or use animal products.

Vegan, the adjective, means using or containing no animal products.

>There are many, many traditional dishes that do not contain meat or even any animal products. I see no reason to suddenly label them "vegetarian" or "vegan".

They are vegan by definition

>But when people work hard to make a burger without any animal products then it does make some sense to call the result "vegan food" in that it was made specifically to suit vegan people.

Perhaps that is your modern interpretation of what "vegan" means, but it is not accurate. Hummus, for example, is a vegan dish regardless of having never contained animal products, and regardless of whether or not the person eating it is vegan.