|
|
|
|
|
|
by alephnan
2487 days ago
|
|
|
> No - not for having a YT channel (per se) but for engaging in communications that FB considered to be a conflict of interest. What was the conflict of interest? > And probably (as with most firings), a whole whole bunch of other stuff (besides the nominal "reason"). Probably, but not certainly. |
|
|
Dunno - whatever was running through the HR people's heads.
The whole point is - it wasn't simply for "having a YouTube channel".