[einhverfr]

The US is uniquely guilty of a particular kind of racism used to build a particular kind of economy. Racism in Europe is different than it is in the US. Racism in SE Asia is different than it is in the US. In the US, racism is solely about economic exploitation of working classes by a small group of mostly white (though with some token individuals from other groups) executive/investor class and it has always been this.

Europe's industrialization was built on the back of religious divisions rather than racial ones for example, which makes the problems somewhat different.

[deogeo]

> Europe's industrialization was built on the back of religious divisions rather than racial ones for example

Is this something you just casually throw out, or do you have some data showing that... countries with greater religious divisions industrialized faster?

In any case, "built on the back of" seems overstating things. Find some sin in the past, and claim that it is the source of all the success of a country, for which it must feel eternally guilty. That there are similar, successful countries without this sin, or unsuccessful ones that share it, are details best ignored. E.g. slavery was widespread in Africa and the Ottoman Empire, with wildly different outcomes than in the US, and imperialism certainly wasn't unique to Europe or the US.

[einhverfr]

Sure.

The process as spelled out by a number of thinkers including Sir Thomas More (who was observing some of these things first-hand) and Hilaire Belloc (who was basing his thoughts on such sources as More) was that the Industrial Revolution in Britain (and hence the world since it started there) can be traced back to the way the confiscation of the monasteries lead to spending up the enclosure of the commons. Basically while the Catholic Church had an effect of spreading out power a bit more away from the state, consolidating this in the hands of the state and in the hands of landlords meant that the landlords were much more powerful and therefore pushed peasants off their land in order to raise more profitable goods such as sheep.

The result was a large number of destitute peasants who ended up in the city unable to support themselves. Some of these were shipped en masse to the New World. Others were given destitute wages in the early textile mills.

The same process starts much later in France where you have a parallel confiscation of the monasteries under an effort of secularization following the French Revolution. Although the Reformation fizzled in France for various reasons, the same political pattern of state seizure of Church lands did happen just as it did elsewhere in Europe and this lead to the same destitute masses forced to the cities.

This process closely parallels the way the Andrew Johnson administration pushed freed slaves into the wage labor system thus revving up the industrialization of the North which was jump-started by the civil war.

[env123]

Jesus, your obsession with data... Just read history...

[ben_w]

The history lessons that I grew up with told me that my country was great, and that everything which was bad in the world was the fault of some other nation. Asking for data is one way to get past that.