|
|
|
|
|
by dsfyu404ed
2492 days ago
|
|
If someone wants to invest a quarter million in whatever I'm doing with no strings attached (aka donate) the last thing I'm gonna be doing is asking questions. Most academics, charities, and other operations that run off donations don't have enough money to be picky about where it comes from. Considering that that's basically pocket change to the MIT Media Lab they can afford to do their due diligence and turn people down if need be. Some small charity you've never heard of that runs a summer camp for inner city kids or some no-name research lab at a state university's non-flagship campus (or whatever) is just gonna take the money because they can't afford to be picky. They're not gonna do background checks because the last thing they want is being in a position of weighing the need for money vs the ethics of who's giving it. TL;DR: People and groups with less resources are less picky who they're willing to take money from but MIT doesn't have this excuse. |
|
haha why are you proud of this? That's essentially the quintessential spirit of corruption representing everything wrong with this country and world.