|
|
|
|
|
|
by orian
2490 days ago
|
|
|
Only Esperanto ;-) It depends what sense of universality we're thinking about. It is and will always be a part of Anglo-Saxons domination story, therefore pretty hard to accept by many. It's same with Russian or Chinese. Therefore to be universal but not predatory, the language should be more neutral? Maybe without the army or corporations who inflict it? |
|
|