[hartror]

So pretty much what you are saying is backing up what I have said. If thimerosal and other mercury based were responsible for autism then we should see a drop in diagnosis rates relative to the decrease in the use of thimerosal.

As there has been none there is no like, causal or otherwise.

But please keep going, this is almost as fun as playing Battlefield . . .

[originalgeek]

Let me translate for you. It says there was no law forbidding the use of Thimerosal, and also it says plainly that Congress found in 2007 that some vaccines still contained it. Thus, your statement that it was "eliminated in 2001" is false.

[hartror]

Continue replying to a cowards throw away account? Sure why not it is Friday night and I have a beer in hand.

Perhaps go back and read my comment you grossly misquoted [1] where I say "removed from most vaccines" if you are going to try to quote me at least do it right.

You should read the quote you posted then revise what correlation and causation mean in respect to science and biology in particular.

What you quoted explicitly states "thimerosal remains in several nonroutinely administered childhood vaccines". Note it says nonroutinely, which I will translate for you means not often. So even if only a fraction of the routinely used childhood vaccines had thimerosal removed in the past decade (and it sounds from your quote that none of the routinely ones did have it still in there in 07) we would see a corresponding drop in autism diagnosis rates.

We haven't.

Ball is in your court cowardly sir if you really believe in what you say you'll use your real account, no one is left on this thread to downvote you.

[1] http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2073702 (Note i posted that a day ago and HN lock comment editing after a short period of time just in case you are wondering).