Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by cryptonector 2499 days ago
Kerberos tickets are cacheable and cached, and the load on KDCs is not high. But Kerberos does require always-online infrastructure, whereas PKIX requires revocation, which requires... always-online infrastructure. The only reason Kerberos doesn't have revocation protocols is that its tickets are short-lived, and that's how to avoid the need for revocation with PKIX: use fresh, short-lived certificates.
1 comments

Technically, you could deliver revocations via a carrier pigeon, but of course it opens a joke hole of an attack. Unless it's a short distance for the pigeons.

As does automatic unvetted certificate signing (because non-repudiation), or automatic instant revocation process. (Denial of service or downgrade)

Pick your poison.

People get bit by certificate expiration all the time.

The only way to make sure you don't get bitten by things like certificate expiration is to exercise update path often, and the more often the better.