Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Barrin92 2504 days ago
>Now add the Chernobyl TV series on top, it will be replayed and memefied everywhere a plant is proposed.

btw are there other people who thought the show was really awful? I know this is a contrarian take but the constant <dialog about soviet doublethink> every three minutes was about as subtle as a sledgehammer.

About half an hour into the first episodes I was like, yeah I get it these people lie a lot to save their own skin. And while I'm not exactly crazy about physics correctness, the way it radiation was dramatized was just unnecessary, a pregnant woman isn't suddenly going to die or get birth defects from standing next to someone was exposed to radiation. The show gave the whole incident the flair of a zombie apocalypse.

1 comments

> a pregnant woman isn't suddenly going to die or get birth defects from standing next to someone was exposed to radiation

In real life the baby died four hours after birth from radiation-induced heart and liver defects: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasily_Ignatenko

The man’s body absorbed radioactive materials that were slowly unleashed as he disintegrated.

the wikipedia article claims that the child's illness was radiation induced but the provided source does not.

Just to give you an actual statistic rather than anecdote, among Hiroshima bomb survivors the incidence of birth defects was about 0.9%, or about 500 children in total. I'm not entirely sure how trustworthy this story is.

> among Hiroshima bomb survivors the incidence of birth defects was about 0.9%, or about 500 children in total

From what I understand, this is because the blast spread the radioactive material very far and thin, reducing its concentration in any given area.