| > It's not insulting, but I'm "insulting the creator"? What exactly are you contending? If you tried to insult me, but I didn't find it insulting, you would still have gone online to insult me even though I didn't find it insulting. > No, "most people" don't necessarily like it. False, you're not 'most people'. Every main distribution has picked it up. You're living in a bubble perhaps. > woodwork to white-knight for it when some one criticizes it? Oh god, now the white-knight defense? Come on, your argument starts okay and then you say absolute rubbish like this. I fail to see how calling some programmer a moron is going to help improve systemd. > It is not built to do low-level init stuff during bootstrapping or within the init itself, hence the name Desktop bus. It started that way, but that's no longer true. Some could argue that systemd allows dbus to go back to what it does best. Before dbus was being use to start long running daemons, etc. > With respect to incompatibility: you now have to use journald. Very valid reasons for this, this video[0] conviced me but perhaps you won't be
swayed. [0]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1lUeQVYuNs Anyway, thanks for not getting personal in the comments. All the best. |