|
|
|
|
|
|
by Mathnerd314
2501 days ago
|
|
|
I assume he's seeing construction fraud? Then the builder would be liable rather than the policyholder, and IANAL but probably the insurance company wouldn't have standing to do anything even if they wanted to since they don't own the building. Or is he correcting details of the properties used in some actuarial model? I suppose that would be more interesting but I can't imagine that a 4x premium adjustment or whatever would be worth suing for. |
|
|