[coldtea]

>So the number of people that prefer spaces far outweighs the tabbers. Now, take the pool of people that use spaces and tabs and let them compete for a 100k job. 9 times out of 10 even if randomly hired it will be a space person.

Err, is the distribution is only affected by the number in each category (and not e.g. tab/space preference), then you'd be able to sample the same results for 30k jobs. 9 times out of ten it will be a space person there too.

Thus, if the 28,657 survey respondents are also randomly distributed, the ratio of poor vs good paid would be the same as real life, as would be the ratio of tabs vs spaces.

In other words, one wouldn't expect a skew in one category in favor of the other (if the choice wasn't a factor). Of course correlation != causation, but correlation can point to causation, or to a third, unknown factor that correlates with both attributes.