[threeseed]

Cameras don't work reliably in inclement weather either.

So what was Musk's point ?

[yo-scot-99]

there's 200-300k cars out there with just cameras + radar and their bet is the software catches up to the rhetoric. Adding lidar is next to impossible on the current fleet and adds to the cost if they start now. It is an early design bet which the coders now have to meet.

[alkonaut]

But no car sold yet (or in the coming decade) will have close to “full autonomy”. Not even close.

[macintux]

He’s been promising otherwise.

[alkonaut]

Hopefully no one bought a car hoping it will magically be “fully autonomous” in the future, given that no one knows whether it will even be possible with a research vehicle in 10 years

[microtherion]

If they weren't hoping that, it would seem odd for them to pay several thousand dollars for a "Full Self Driving" option.

[alkonaut]

Yeah, I mean I hope people realize that just a few thousand and ”Full self driving” doesn’t imply ”Fully autonomous” in the sense that people can use their Tesla as an Uber and be drunk in the back seat! It just means that they’ll have the best autonomy that Tesla can provide which still means they have to pay attention. “Fully autonomous” to me is the point where my kid who can’t drive can use it as a taxi to school with no other driver etc. Musk doesn’t imagine that yet I hope.

[aidenn0]

I wasn't claiming Musk was right, just that the article is a non-sequitur