|
|
|
|
|
by hemansan
2499 days ago
|
|
India is preventing the fate of Yugoslavia. It would have been occupation if Kashmiris had lesser rights but that's not the case. People don't ask what rights did people of Kashmir didn't have that people of India had since 1947. India is a country of diverse religions, and ethnic groups.
If a minority group demands separate nation should you give autonomy to it? If London becomes Muslim majority, and demands separation, should England give in to that demand? If India gives away Kashmir, it means you can never trust minority of your country because they can ask for separate nation and the world will support that demand. Do we really think that helps the cause of minorities in India or any other country in the world? |
|