|
|
|
|
|
by Kaiyou
2500 days ago
|
|
I'd say it's unprovable and that you should just accept that you cannot prove your claim. After all, you don't know every [X] and just this moment a new [X] could've been published, which is better than the one you claim to be the best. Just change your scope to something provable if you want your claims to be believed by sceptics. For example "[X] is the best that I know." would work. |
|
There are two competing claims "examine is the best supplement website online"(examiners) vs "there exists a better supplement supplement website online".(otherers) One of these is true and the other is false.
While lots of "examiners" have argued and provided evidence, but the only argument brought by the "otherers" is they they don't need to bring any evidence.