| > Why did you focus on one irrelevant aspect of that document? Because that irrelevant part was the only one that would give AMP any semblance of being open. > iOS had broken iFrame scrolling for years. If you can implement safe instant loading while working around that iOS bug, let's hear it. I advise you learn something for yourself. Several fixes were provided to AMP but they were rejected without discussion. > Exactly the same as RSS. Let's see how AMP is "exactly the same as RSS": - RSS is a feed, AMP is not - RSS feed is discoverable via a meta tag, AMP pages are not (you have to search in a search engine, or have a cache of pages) - RSS is a simple format that can be trivially parsed to retrieve data such as: author, publish date, url to original page, description, and content. AMP requires a near-full HTML parser with AMP-specific extensions: AMP is not valid HTML 5, AMP validator will allow some non-valid HTML5. Additionally, AMP relies on custom elements. - Any and all RSS readers and aggregators link to the original website in a trivial and discoverable way. There's no url hijacking. AMP all but requires AMP Caches to be fast, and AMP Cache design all but requires to display content not at the original link, but at the Cache's URL. For several years the "open" AMP would deny this was a problem and pretended "it was an implementation detail that AMP is not concerned with" and "we will work with browsers on how to present the canonical URL". And even now the largest AMP cache regularly employs dark patterns to prevent users from visiting the canonical URL. So yeah. I see how AMP is exactly like RSS. |
No, that is the only part of the document when taken out of context that gives AMP any semblance of not being open. The TSC is what makes AMP open, and you ignored it and continue to ignore it after I explicitly called it out.
> Several fixes were provided to AMP but they were rejected without discussion.
Where?
> RSS is a feed, AMP is not
You need to work on your reading comprehension. That quote that you took out of context says that AMP is exactly like RSS on that particular point. I have repeatedly explicitly pointed out that AMP is like RSS items, not like RSS feeds.
Let me know when you're ready to continue the discussion in earnest instead of going to great distances to strawman every point.