|
|
|
|
|
by EGreg
2506 days ago
|
|
To me it seems as simplistic as speaking about female hysteria (which was the case in the medical profession for centuries, ever since the Greeks). Thinking in terms of “female traits” that are taken to an extreme. That kind of thinking itself says women should be afraid to give in too much into “their nature”, because it’s just a societal construct where they are encouraged to be, say, irrational, catty, moody, whatever. (They have to question who they act and “be more logical like men” — a social conservative like Jesse Peterson would still advocate that today.) (And frankly I believe that ADD is the new Hysteria, but for kids.) Does that sound like a productive way to conduct public discourse and discuss issues among adults? Some companies have experimented with it in a big way. Here is the Result: https://onenewsnow.com/business/2019/08/02/gillette-cut-by-8... |
|
Contrast with toxic masculinity, which focuses on external, societal pressures which force/encourage men to behave in ways that are harmful to themselves and others, rejecting the idea that men are "just like that".
(As for ADD being the hysteria being the new hysteria, I can totally see the resemblance)
Also, the website for your source is run by a fundamentalist, anti-LGBT hate group [1], so you might want to consider picking a different one.
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Family_Association