Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by blihp 2504 days ago
I'd suggest that your premise ('hardly any people with experience') is wrong. Half the skills you list are relatively common. For a company of your size, finding a few dozen people with most of those skills in any major metro area in the U.S. is pretty trivial. Granted, the price you'll have to pay for them might not make you happy[1]... but they do exist.

[1] it's not FAANG level, but it's also not 105k. (if your top end compensation is significantly higher, you should probably be indicating that. Or perhaps breaking out minimum salary by position if they differ significantly.)
1 comments
doh 2504 days ago
> Half the skills you list are relatively common

Which skills?

> it's not FAANG level, but it's also not 105k.

105k is minimum wage for an engineer. That's why it says minimum in the post.

link
blihp 2504 days ago
> Which skills?

C/C++, DBA/Architect, Java, DevOps, QA

> 105k is minimum wage for an engineer. That's why it says minimum in the post.

Perhaps it's just me, but when I see a salary listing without I high-end, I assume that's because it's pretty low.

link
doh 2504 days ago
> C/C++, DBA/Architect, Java, DevOps, QA

Those are not skills, those are positions. We don't list skills, as they are quite arbitrary and really don't say much about their potential.

> Perhaps it's just me, but when I see a salary listing without I high-end, I assume that's because it's pretty low.

We found that writing the upper bound, many candidate assume that the upper bound is the general compensation and get quite upset if we don't value them as high.

We found this to be working better.

link