> How do you know? And even if it doesn't for starters, there's no telling it'll stay that way.
Same way I know there's no pagan god hiding in my phone whispering my secrets to evil aliens: by actually working with the technology, observing the behaviour of my device and reading the privacy policies and activity log published by Google and not finding any proof.
Of course you can argue that Google might lie for whatever reason... but then you probably shouldn't be using Google Maps at all. Or any product built by a corporation.
Also by watching the upload bandwidth. If it streams the live video feed off the device at anywhere near being useful for facial recognition it would be very noticeable.
It doesn't have to be the entire video feed. it could be snapshots from a specific direction. If millions use it, there's a good chance even a handful of snapshots from each user at a location that thousands of people pass by could get it mapped better than how they currently do.
Sundar repeatedly stated in this Google I/O 2019 presentation how they were condensing and bringing AI and ML techniques onboard to phones to provide better responsiveness and lower the security issues of taking private data into their cloud.
A very good result from all the bad press they've gotten lately. If Google can improve its stance on privacy then I think it solves it's biggest problem.
Same way I know there's no pagan god hiding in my phone whispering my secrets to evil aliens: by actually working with the technology, observing the behaviour of my device and reading the privacy policies and activity log published by Google and not finding any proof.
Of course you can argue that Google might lie for whatever reason... but then you probably shouldn't be using Google Maps at all. Or any product built by a corporation.