[selectstatement]

Humans are a very adaptable species and there are no guarantees that the environment should continue as it once was perpetually. The situations in theses articles are just as likely to not happen as they are to come true.

[inawarminister]

It's important to mention that the current-ish (started 10,000 years ago in the Younger Dryas) warmth of Interglacial era made us able to settle down and practise agriculture. Before that, for millions of years - we're stuck as Hunter-Gatherers, forever in the mercy of Nature.

Perhaps in the days of tomorrow, we will once again be in the mercy of Nature? Of course not, as long as we retain our technologies. Ergo, even if you (and I agree) don't think climate change will doom humanity as a whole, I'd still be sympathetic to rational campaigns reducing it's effects.

[patientplatypus]

The situations in theses articles are just as likely to not happen as they are to come true.

Um, what? On what are you basing this likelihood on? These are scientists that study this for a living. This sounds like complete fabrication.

[selectstatement]

That doesn't mean that they can predict the future with high accuracy. They might have some chance slightly above random but there are way too many variables unconsidered.

All it takes is one asteroid to invalidate all the predictions. Or one war. Or one biological contagion. Or one technological innovation.

[Fjolsvith]

Then we should just lay down and die from the fear.