|
|
|
|
|
by k_sze
2507 days ago
|
|
Exactly. It’s a tongue-in-cheek that basically says that you need to circumvent censorship when you want to talk about censorship. By the way, I’m not a linguist and I just completely made up that usage of “atonal homophone”. Could an actual linguist chime in and tell us what’s the correct way to describe a “homophone” that doesn’t match in tone, in the context of a tonal language like Chinese? |
|