[notathing]

Indeed. But we need to go further than that. There are (a few) scientists which identify with the Right, or worse, challenge some climate change facts. They should be fired, we can't have science legitimize fascists movements or throw doubt on established science facts.

[monksy]

Uh. This is exactly what is wrong with scientist pairing their results and methodology with politics.

> They should be fired, we can't have science legitimize fascists movements.

Ok, if you want to get rid of a strong scientific community continue on with this fantasy. Propagandists making things up should be exiled.

The climate change assertions should be challenged. That's apart of the scientific method. You don't publish directly to a respected journal. Also, correlation does not imply causation.

Their unbiased* findings should assist in the creation of solutions which involve policymakers. It's not a scientists' job to make a decision that affects everyone.

Unbiased means: As unbiased as you can get. Get it peer-reviewed. Work with others to test out effective change strategies to avoid unintended consequences, present options, accept failure. (Yes, that last one is the biggest thing)

[dnissley]

Can't tell if sarcasm or serious.