[jki275]

Well, it's not one man, it's 53 men and women, and that's not abdication it's politics -- as practiced by both sides when in power.

[jachee]

Look into Mitch McConnell's record—or rather lack thereof—for allowing House-passed bills onto the Senate floor. He's one man undermining the spirit of our government for his own political agenda.

[jki275]

Look at Reid's.

Don't pretend that one party doesn't have a political agenda. That would be silly.

[jki275]

Another note - wasting senate time on a bill that cannot pass is not necessary and there’s no point in doing it - for either party - beyond a desire to grandstand. Everyone in congress has a political agenda.

[jachee]

I'd argue that each Senator's sole job is to debate and vote on legislation as a representative of their state—not their SuperPAC-backed party bloc.

Wasting their time is paying them to not do their job because a single person's will is preventing it from being possible.

The debate and voting is the entire point of the system. For both parties.

[jki275]

You can argue that all day long, but the fact of the matter is that there is limited time and a bill that has zero chance of passage is wasting everyone's time and not getting the actual business of congress done.

That's how both parties have done business for decades, it's not a new thing from McConnell. Most of GW's nominees were never brought to a hearing or vote by a Democratic senate. The senate can bring any bill or nominee to the floor if they have enough support -- the majority leader can't keep anything from a vote if it has enough support to pass.