|
|
|
|
|
by rrss
2509 days ago
|
|
> OpenCL since it's portable Even if you choose OpenCL, the tools (profiler, debugger, etc) are usually platform specific. In addition, my experience with opencl across platforms was that each of the vendors' compilers had distinct issues and that performance was not portable. I get the appeal for an open API, but opencl never grew a development ecosystem or any libraries. IMO it is dying and isn't worth the effort. AMD is implementing CUDA with hip - maybe roll with that. |
|