Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by newaccoutnas 2511 days ago
I would not discount government 'incentives' to BT. Hundreds of millions have come the public purse for contracts that were supposedly put up for public tender. BT got about 95% of them.

edit: there are other issues in the UK, like fibre tax, that makes the situation even more difficult for competition.

1 comments

None of the other providers wanted to serve low value customers is the blunt reason.
I'm not sure that's the case, otherwise why would community driven projects like https://b4rn.org.uk/ exist if BT was serving low-value customers properly? In reality they're the company that doesn't see the value in investment there, completely counter to what the pubic purse was supposed to be supporting.