[Lunatic666]

But I haven't answered your question precisely: We don't offer a pair, because we don't use the coding platforms. I'd say the homework counts about 80%, the following tech interview 20%.

Of course I have to trust the candidates that they made the homework themselves, but if you don't start on a trust basis that would be a really bad starting point. There's still probation to make sure they're a good fit. I'm investing a lot more work into vetting when it's an overseas candidate compared to local, but mostly to make sure we don't put someone on the street, because I didn't do my job properly.

[fsniper]

This process still doesn't cover my problems.

I do have the experience, and have the code to show. Why would I be subject to a "homework"?

This process objectively discriminate against people with enough age and experience, but don't have the time outside work. Even just not having the will to do a "homework" is an enough reason to pass.

Are you hunting for young eager engineers who can put the most to self proving, or a diverse experience base?

I am not suggesting anything against your process, but highlighting the shortcomings.

I would probably pass your interview process directly.