| There are some relevant information that must be taken in consideration. Brazil has about 66.3% of its overall land in a “reserved/protected” state, which is protected by law. Source: https://agroecologia.org.br/2019/01/14/censo-agropecuario-de... This is over 631 million hectares of land destined for preservation,
Equivalent to 48 European countries COMBINED. Amazon is not just IN BRAZIL, but spans over 9 nations. No, I am not saying that’s a “green light” for full on deforestation nor I am saying that Brazil is doing a the most fantastic job preserving it. What I am saying is that Brazil IS doing something to preserve the Amazon AND other forest land such as “Serra do Mar” and that a coalition of funds/resources could help improve enforcement of the law in these Protected areas. This much more “attainable” or acceptable by the current Brazilian government, which is currently very nationalist and patriotic. (President is retired Army captain, very right wing) Brazil would not part/sell with a piece of its national sovereign territory to anyone, even if it’s for a “greater good”, just as US would not sell the Tongass forest in Alaska or the Humboldt-Toiyabe in California/Nevada “for greater
good” Every country has it’s share in controlling carbon emissions and global warming. No country should “outsource” their share of responsibility by enforcing environmental protection standards they are not willing to withhold themselves. TL;DR: Brazil has some protections in place, could use some help, would not sell the Amazon because it’s part/territory of Brazil and 8 other countries. Full disclosure: Brazilian by birth, American by choice |
One can understand how this attitude undermines the integrity of the reserve.