[kartan]

> despite 8chan being a breeding ground of hate, threads by mass shooters are typically removed in minutes

So, it is ok that people promote and help mass shooters as far as there is no direct connection the day of the attack?

> Going there is just asking for trouble and I would urge anyone curious to look for screenshots instead of actually visiting the website.

Is a screenshot of hate speech promoting hate less than a rendered HTML page?

I will imagine that an Islamic extremist site will be closed within minutes of gaining notoriety. Why are we sparing white-nationalist propaganda?

[dx87]

You'd be imagining wrong. Cloudflare left up ISIS websites because they said it isn't their job police content.

[SOLAR_FIELDS]

You know, I don’t necessarily disagree with Cloudlare’s take on “we shouldn’t be the internet police”, but do find it kind of funny that their ideology and approach conveniently aligns with being the absolute cheapest and laziest approach to the problem.

[cbHXBY1D]

Which is every corporations modus operandi.

[Causality1]

Oh, I'm not saying find a screenshot because it encourages them less, I'm saying find a screenshot because if you go there you risk being mentally scarred, to say nothing if someone sees it in your internet history or you're dumb enough to visit it on a corporate network or work laptop/phone. That would be a well-deserved firing, if not for being a racist then for being a moron.

>Why are we sparing white-nationalist propaganda?

Racist propaganda doesn't violate anyone's rights and is hence protected speech. Imminent threats and specific calls to violence are a different matter.

[kartan]

> Imminent threats and specific calls to violence are a different matter.

That is what I find disturbing. That general threads and calls to violence are ok. That threatening your neighbor is ok meanwhile you do not set a date and a time for the violence.

Finally, if I say that Coca-Cola causes cancer the Coca-Cola Company can sue me for lying. But, if I lie about your race is on because it only affects men, women and children economy, well-being and dignity but no corporation bottom line is hurt.

It seems that free of expression has some intriguing limitation when is convenient for some. Don't you think that racist propaganda may be protected because historical reasons and not any logic or benevolent intention?

[whenchamenia]

Nope, free speech is free.