|
|
|
|
|
by CryptoPunk
2517 days ago
|
|
When wages were rapidly growing in the late 19th century, the US offered the highest wages in the world. It's possible to have both high wages and competitive production facilities. That happens when the skill-set of the workforce and the infrastructure and supply-chain of the nation improve enough to compensate for the higher wages. Forcing companies to pay wages that are above the level that they would be at if left to market forces results in parties in the US less effectively utilizing labor and capital to raise productivity. Less productivity growth ultimately means less wage growth. The wage boost that comes from a law mandating companies pay higher wages is a one time event, that results from an increase in labor's share of total income, and comes at the expense of lower recurring boosts to wages, because the disruption to the economy caused by such a law reduces the rate of economic growth. So laws that force companies to pay higher wages mean, in the long run, people being poorer than they would otherwise be. |
|