| "But as this article demonstrates, if we care to use the inflammatory "death panels" label, we already have them." It's not inflammatory when it's true. When the government runs our healthcare, choices are removed and someone else gets to decide if you should get surgery needed or not...and many times this is life or death. At least now, if a cancer patient gets denied drugs, they can go to another doctor or get a second opinion. All of my elderly relatives live in Canada and come over the border for any major surgery. This is mostly because the wait times are sometimes in the years..when they can just get private care in the US and get it done in a matter of weeks. Doctors are also usually maxed out when it comes to patients, so individual care is lacking and they usually just want to try to push you out the door. I also feel like I should have a say in someone's behavior, if I'm paying for their healthcare with my tax dollars: smoking, drinking, risky behavior, etc. I've lived in countries with universal healthcare and the quality is sub-par compared to the US/private care. Sure private care can be improved, but it shouldn't be ripped out and replaced. |
This is not true; if your insurance company will not cover a specific drug then going to another doctor will make no difference. And you can’t go to another insurance company outside of open enrolment - assuming your employer even offers plans from more than one insurer.