|
|
|
|
|
by avar
2518 days ago
|
|
The main competitor isn't other mainframes, but PCs. A lot of mainframe users never needed a mainframe, they just didn't want to get fired for not buying IBM. Other users need some sort of mainframe reliability, but that's also achievable on a distributed system running on unreliable PCs. There are some users whose use is genuinely deeply entwined with features mainframes provide, but those are dying out. |
|
I don't buy this. Many of our critical systems are on PC architectures. Mainframes don't have some magic sauce, well designed distributed architectures should offer enough reliability.
Edit: reading comprehension fail, please ignore my comment :-)