| Thanks! We're very happy to finally share the announcements. We bet on GraphQL very early on, right after the initial specs came out, as their language was surprisingly similar to what we were working on. We have not looked back since then, as GraphQL growth is pretty impressive as the creation of GraphQL foundation. We are considering supporting cypher because many people are actually quite used to it, it's an open specification, and would also help us make more "apples to apples" comparisons with other databases (hi, Neo4j!). For now, though, we're focusing on providing native support for pure GraphQL (not only GraphQL+-) but we don't discard adding Cypher later on. As for the pricing, this is for a cluster with 2 nodes (1 alphas + 1 zero) and includes support and access to enterprise features. This, actually, ends up being often more affordable than our competition (or so our customers have told us). We believe it's time for Graph DBs to become the default storage system, in the same way people consider SQL and no-SQL options nowadays, so our target audience is much wider than just people interested on graph databases. Lastly, regarding Mongo + Redis I was not aware of this so I'll be checking it out soon and then I can give you my opinion :) Happy to continue the conversation on slack.dgraph.io or discuss.dgraph.io! |