Calling something "responsible" doesn't make it so. When Google first started this "responsible" disclosure in October of 2014 with Microsoft, Microsoft had a fix setup to be released on Patch Tuesday and asked Google if they could wait to disclose it until then. A mere two days. Google refused and released details on Sunday.
How was releasing the details 2 days early responsible or beneficial? At best it got customers worked up and made them question Microsoft's patch policies.
Do you think in the intervening 2 days anyone took any actions knowing the patch would arrive Tuesday?
Google hides behind "responsible disclosure" as an excuse for using Project Zero tactically to do PR damage to competitors.
How was releasing the details 2 days early responsible or beneficial? At best it got customers worked up and made them question Microsoft's patch policies.
Do you think in the intervening 2 days anyone took any actions knowing the patch would arrive Tuesday?
Google hides behind "responsible disclosure" as an excuse for using Project Zero tactically to do PR damage to competitors.