|
|
|
|
|
by mr_tristan
2521 days ago
|
|
Oh yes. #1 problem I've experienced at multiple places: delaying integration with tons of branching. Usually the PM or PO force everyones to using some vague "product version" they track for public releases. Places that use monorepos well tend to have very few branches (like, maybe 2 or 3), which have nothing to do with your public product versioning scheme, and instead use "branch by abstraction" to stay integrated. But what I end up seeing, is that the product team and middle management gets involved with dictating version control, e.g., "this will be version 1.2, and then that should be 2.3, ok let's cut those branches...", and then they change their minds as some team has to delay and before another is ready. And then bugs start rolling in from both testing and they don't know what to do, and they start asking people to just "get it done", and then, things really start falling apart. You add 10+ teams trying to use branches for their own work based off of god knows what and it becomes a mess of crazy integration problems. I seriously think that a huge benefit of multiple repositories, is that is scares the pseudo-technical managers and product people into not bothering with trying to track or dictate usage of the version control system. |
|