Y
Hacker News
new
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
by
bifrost
2523 days ago
You don't need batteries with nuclear, at all. There's also less habitat destruction, less issue with bird strikes, less people falling off towers, less issues with "view obstruction".
1 comments
danaris
2523 days ago
I think he meant including the batteries in the solar/wind costs, which would make nuclear (relatively) cheaper.
link
teabee89
2523 days ago
This is what I meant indeed. Edited original question.
link