Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by bifrost 2523 days ago
You don't need batteries with nuclear, at all. There's also less habitat destruction, less issue with bird strikes, less people falling off towers, less issues with "view obstruction".
1 comments

I think he meant including the batteries in the solar/wind costs, which would make nuclear (relatively) cheaper.
This is what I meant indeed. Edited original question.