|
|
|
|
|
by abakker
2512 days ago
|
|
If this were true, they would be easier to get done. Borrowing money to finance is fine, but a lot of these projects have to borrow a vet long way in the future, and the longer the term of the loan, the more interest rates eat into the real return from the project. Secondarily, many prospective borrowers of these projects are already in debt, and have cash flows which are not growing fast enough to borrow more. |
|
why should a gov't project need to have any real returns? Social returns is enough. If the city is nicer to live in, if the businesses thrive because of increaed foot traffic, lower car accident rates, cleaner air etc.