[isostatic]

> you could argue systemd shouldn’t be a daemon too and sysv init scripts are better too.

You certainly could.

[oblio]

And you'd be wrong... The init system will always be a daemon, for obvious reasons ;-)

[isostatic]

You're begging the question that systemd should be the init system

[oblio]

I'm not. The original questions were:

> systemd shouldn’t be a daemon too

A. False.

> and sysv init scripts are better too

B. Debatable, but the start is a false premise, SysV init was a daemon plus the scripts.