|
|
|
|
|
by redlizard
2513 days ago
|
|
“If it was me, I would try medical therapy first, but it depends on how severe the pain is,” Dr. Mack said. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/25/health/neil-armstrong-hea... If someone was 82, and a quality-of-life surgery is elected to be performed, it is always the patient and the doctors making that decision.
Surgeries can go wrong, they carry risk, heart surgery more so, heart surgery with an 82 year old even more so. Should we be holding the health care system accountable?
Even when the risks are known? Do we all of a sudden have the expectation that every open heart surgery will be successful and no one will die?
Hospitals shouldn't be rewarded for failures, but placing full blame on an organization with an impossible mandate seems a little bit unfair. |
|
"Do patients always die if wire removal causes bleeding? No — it is very rare, surgeons said. Patients should be rushed to the operating room ... But Mr. Armstrong was taken to a cardiac catheterization lab first, before he went to surgery. The cath lab, Dr. Haft said, 'is not the solution.' ... By the time Mr. Armstrong got to the operating room, his heart had stopped and he had brain damage from a lack of blood to his brain. He died without regaining consciousness."
"The expert reviews focus on the hospital’s decision to bring Mr. Armstrong to a catheterization lab rather than directly to an operating room when he began to experience complications. 'The decision to go to the cath lab was THE major error,' Dr. Joseph Bavaria, a vice-chair of cardiothoracic surgery at University of Pennsylvania wrote in a review conducted at the request of the Armstrong family."