I didn't say that either, and it doesn't matter. The problem is of the same general type. It's more than close enough. The FAA should be extra-careful, so maybe the A321neo will get banned. If the EASA wants to take a hard line on safety, they can hardly object.
After a bit of high-level discussion using that leverage, things may change.
These decisions, in all countries, are being made with consideration for international economic implications. The resulting decisions will be given technical justification as required.
We do not have details of this anomaly, but I hope you understand that some situations must be simulated, flying into them is difficult, maybe not possible, or downright unsafe.
I don't know how much about planes do you know (I'm starting to feel not much since excessive, maintained pitch during flare didn't tell you anything). But the context explained here is rare and obviously more manageable than "one of three redundant sensors failed and an aircraft went out of the sky without giving the crew even a possibility to save their lives".
EDIT:
Found new details. The pilot has to keep the excessive pitch although AWARE that he is stalling the aircraft.
After a bit of high-level discussion using that leverage, things may change.
These decisions, in all countries, are being made with consideration for international economic implications. The resulting decisions will be given technical justification as required.