Yes, if you pick the most embarrassing time period for a given stock, it probably massively under-performed. Alternately, you can pick the most flattering time period.
It was a statement about a 5-year period in a stock issued just a few weeks longer than 9 years ago. Are you seriously making a cherry picking argument?
Its under-performance over 2 and 5 years explains why it's been such a great short. Investors like Chanos have a basket of shorts so any one stock ripping up would hurt but wouldn't kill them. And the shorts ultimately let them be even more net-long the market.